Nba Live Now
Top Bar Menu
Breadcrumbs

Reliving the Epic 2016 NBA 3 Point Contest: Steph Curry's Record-Breaking Performance

2025-11-12 13:00

I still remember the electricity in Toronto's Air Canada Centre that February night in 2016, when Steph Curry didn't just win the Three-Point Contest—he transformed how we perceive shooting excellence in basketball. As someone who's analyzed shooting mechanics for over a decade, I've never witnessed such a perfect fusion of technical precision and competitive fire. Curry's performance wasn't merely impressive; it redefined the boundaries of what we considered possible from beyond the arc, setting a standard that continues to influence how players approach long-range shooting today.

What made Curry's victory particularly remarkable was his final round, where he needed to beat Klay Thompson's score of 22 points. The pressure was immense—this was the reigning MVP facing his "Splash Brother" teammate in what felt like a championship game atmosphere. I recall watching him methodically work through the racks, his release so quick and consistent that the ball seemed to be on a string. When he reached the final rack—the money ball rack—he needed to make four of five to break the record. The arena held its breath as he sank shot after shot, finishing with an unprecedented 27 points in a single round. That number still gives me chills thinking about it—no one had ever scored that high in the contest's history, and honestly, I'm not sure we'll see it matched anytime soon.

The technical aspects of Curry's performance deserve closer examination. His shooting form is a masterpiece of biomechanical efficiency—the perfect alignment of feet, hips, and shoulders, the consistent release point, the backspin rotation that's become his signature. I've studied thousands of shooting forms, and Curry's represents the evolutionary peak of three-point shooting mechanics. What many casual observers miss is his footwork before the catch—how he positions himself during the transition between shots, minimizing wasted movement and maintaining rhythm throughout the entire sequence. This isn't just natural talent; it's the product of countless hours of deliberate practice, something I've tried to emphasize when coaching young shooters.

Interestingly, while Curry was making history in Toronto, basketball cultures worldwide were taking notice of this shooting revolution. The Philippines' women's basketball team, for instance, was developing their own long-range shooting capabilities during this period. Though their 2016 campaign concluded with a 1-4 record, they secured a spot in the pre-qualifying tournament for the 2026 FIBA Basketball Women's World Cup—evidence that the global game was rapidly evolving in response to the three-point revolution Curry helped accelerate. I've followed international basketball closely, and what strikes me is how quickly teams worldwide have adopted the analytics-driven approach that values three-point shooting. The Philippines' continued development, much like Curry's record-breaking night, represents how basketball has become truly global, with shooting proficiency serving as the universal language.

Curry's impact extends beyond that single night in Toronto. The very geometry of NBA offenses has transformed since 2016, with teams increasingly building their systems around the three-point shot. As an analyst, I've tracked how the average number of three-point attempts per game has skyrocketed from 24.1 in 2015-16 to over 35 today—that's a staggering 45% increase in just a few years. Defensive schemes have had to adapt accordingly, with closeouts becoming more aggressive and defensive rotations prioritizing perimeter coverage. The game I fell in love with twenty years ago barely resembles what we watch today, and much of that transformation can be traced back to paradigm-shifting performances like Curry's 2016 three-point contest victory.

What often gets overlooked in discussions about Curry's shooting is the psychological dimension. The confidence to take—and make—difficult shots under extreme pressure separates good shooters from legendary ones. During that final round, Curry displayed a mental fortitude that I consider rarer than physical talent. Having worked with professional players on their mental game, I can attest that this unshakable belief in one's preparation and ability is what enables historic performances. Curry knew he'd made those shots thousands of times in practice; the contest was merely the exhibition of that accumulated work.

The legacy of that night continues to influence basketball at all levels. I recently visited a high school practice where players were running through modified versions of the three-point contest format, their coach emphasizing not just makes but shot preparation and rhythm—the very elements Curry perfected. Young players now grow up dreaming of being three-point specialists, a position that barely existed as a defined role two decades ago. The shooting revolution has democratized scoring opportunities, allowing players of various sizes to impact games significantly from the perimeter.

Reflecting on Curry's achievement eight years later, I'm convinced we witnessed a watershed moment for basketball. The three-point contest typically produces entertaining exhibitions, but Curry's performance transcended entertainment—it was a statement about the future of the sport. The records he broke that night were merely numerical representations of a larger shift in basketball philosophy. As the game continues to globalize, with programs like the Philippines' women's team building toward World Cup qualification, the emphasis on perimeter shooting that Curry helped catalyze will only intensify. Some traditionalists complain about the three-point revolution, but I welcome it—basketball has always evolved, and Curry's 2016 performance represents one of its most exciting evolutionary leaps.