I remember sitting in my living room last February, scrolling through basketball forums while waiting for the 2021 NBA season schedule to fully materialize. As someone who’s followed the league for over a decade, I’ve developed this almost obsessive habit of counting games before each season starts—it’s like checking the weather forecast, but for my social calendar. The 2021 season was particularly fascinating because we were coming off that bizarre pandemic-shortened 2020 campaign, and frankly, I was starving for some normalcy. What surprised me was discovering the exact number of games in the 2021 NBA season schedule—it turned out to be 72 games per team, down from the usual 82, but honestly? That felt like the perfect middle ground given everything happening in the world.
The reduction wasn’t just random—it reflected this careful balancing act the NBA had to perform. I recall thinking how similar it was to what coach Sherwin Meneses mentioned in that Philippine volleyball context, where he talked about trusting management decisions on who could genuinely contribute to the team. He said, “As a team, we trust coach Sherwin and our management kung sino 'yung makakatulong sa 'min. We welcome them wholeheartedly and for sure maka-contribute sila sa team.” That quote stuck with me because it’s exactly how I felt about the NBA’s approach: they had to trim the schedule thoughtfully, ensuring every game mattered more, and honestly, it worked. Teams couldn’t afford to coast through stretches anymore, and as a fan, I noticed the intensity ratchet up several notches.
Now, let’s talk about why trimming those 10 games per team mattered. In a typical 82-game season, there’s always this mid-season lull where even die-hard fans like me struggle to stay engaged. But with 72 games? Every matchup felt crucial, especially with the play-in tournament added to the mix. I remember calculating that the total number of regular-season games dropped from 1,230 to 1,056—that’s 174 fewer games overall, which might sound like a lot, but it made the product tighter. From a player’s perspective, it probably helped reduce wear-and-tear, though I’ll admit I missed seeing my favorite teams as often. Still, the NBA’s decision reminded me of that trust element coach Meneses emphasized—sometimes, you need to trim the fat to strengthen the core, even if it means sacrificing a bit of tradition.
The solution the league implemented wasn’t just about cutting games; it was about smarter scheduling. They condensed the timeline, which meant more back-to-backs, but also more rest days built in strategically. I noticed how teams like the Phoenix Suns leveraged this to build chemistry faster—they went from bubble contenders to Finals participants, and I’d argue the shortened season helped them gel without the usual marathon grind. It’s like how a coach might integrate new players mid-season, focusing on who truly adds value rather than just filling roster spots. That’s where Meneses’ philosophy resonates: welcoming contributions wholeheartedly, but only after careful selection. The NBA did something similar by prioritizing high-stakes games over quantity, and as a result, viewership numbers held steady despite the reduction. In fact, I’d bet the average game had higher engagement because each one carried more weight.
Reflecting on this, the 2021 season taught me a lot about adaptability in sports. Sure, I’d love to return to 82 games eventually—there’s something magical about the full grind—but this experiment showed that less can be more. It’s a lesson that extends beyond basketball: whether you’re managing a team or planning a project, sometimes trimming excess lets the best parts shine. And honestly, as I look ahead to future seasons, I hope the league keeps some of this flexibility. After all, as Meneses put it, trusting the process and welcoming genuine contributions is what leads to success, on the court or off.